▲ | nl 6 days ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||
"Price dumping" isn't an economic term in common use. "Dumping" in international trade is somewhat similar but the reasons that is illegal are very different: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dumping_(pricing_policy) Pricing at a loss by VC funded companies is great for consumers. It rarely is at a loss though - they look at the lifetime value. Pricing at a loss by big tech could be viewed as anticompetitive. Personally I like that Gemini keeps OpenAI prices lower but one could argue it has stopped OpenAIs growth. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | piva00 6 days ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
> Pricing at a loss by VC funded companies is great for consumers. It rarely is at a loss though - they look at the lifetime value. It's great for consumers only in the short term, the strategy to drive out competition that are not as well-funded has only one goal: to remove competition in the long-term to drive up prices at your will since most competitors won't have the chance to exist. Edit: yes, technically dumping is a specific type of predatory pricing, so swap "price dumping" on my first comment to "predatory pricing" instead. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | Filligree 6 days ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
I wouldn’t assume Gemini is being run at a loss, though. At least not that, if it weren’t, that would help OpenAI much. Google uses Google hardware, which costs them 1/10 what nvidia hardware costs everyone else. |