| |
| ▲ | camgunz 4 days ago | parent | next [-] | | I built a colorscheme for Vim [0] that is close to monochrome when I was worried about blue light (I've since had kids and now this kind of worry doesn't rate at all), and I basically use bold and highlights (I hate underlining, italics, and squiggles, but I think you can do all that too in the GUI version). I found it surprisingly usable. [0]: https://github.com/camgunz/amber | | |
| ▲ | porridgeraisin 4 days ago | parent [-] | | > in the GUI version or in the TUI version, in a terminal like Kitty. I want to try some monochrome UI, but that amber is definitely not my taste. Let me see if there is a "paper-like" theme, or maybe I can make one myself. | | |
| ▲ | camgunz 4 days ago | parent [-] | | I (re)built it w/ a little script I call roygvim [0] -- here's the source [1] [0]: https://github.com/camgunz/roygvim [1]: https://pastebin.com/b0LRpjUC | | |
| ▲ | porridgeraisin 4 days ago | parent [-] | | My attempt: https://images2.imgbox.com/16/79/Tz7rMe2c_o.png colorscheme paper
highlight Normal guibg=#f7f5f0 guifg=#000000 gui=NONE
highlight CursorLine guibg=#f0efea gui=NONE
highlight CursorColumn guibg=#f0efea gui=NONE
highlight Comment guifg=#777777 gui=italic
highlight Constant guifg=#333333 gui=underline
highlight String guifg=#333333 gui=italic
highlight Character guifg=#333333 gui=italic
highlight Number guifg=#333333 gui=underline
highlight Boolean guifg=#333333 gui=underline
highlight Float guifg=#333333 gui=underline
highlight Identifier guifg=#000000 gui=NONE
highlight Function guifg=#000000 gui=bold
highlight Statement guifg=#000000 gui=bold
highlight Conditional guifg=#000000 gui=bold,underline
highlight Repeat guifg=#000000 gui=bold
highlight Label guifg=#000000 gui=bold
highlight Operator guifg=#000000 gui=NONE
highlight Keyword guifg=#000000 gui=bold
highlight PreProc guifg=#333333
highlight Include guifg=#333333 gui=underline
highlight Define guifg=#333333 gui=underline
highlight Macro guifg=#333333 gui=underline
highlight PreCondit guifg=#333333 gui=underline
highlight Type guifg=#000000 gui=bold,italic
highlight StorageClass guifg=#000000 gui=bold
highlight Structure guifg=#000000 gui=bold
highlight Typedef guifg=#000000 gui=bold
highlight Special guifg=#333333 gui=italic
highlight SpecialChar guifg=#333333 gui=italic
highlight Tag guifg=#333333 gui=italic
highlight Delimiter guifg=#000000 gui=NONE
highlight SpecialComment guifg=#777777 gui=italic
highlight Debug guifg=#333333 gui=italic
highlight Underlined guifg=#000000 gui=underline
highlight Error guifg=#000000 gui=bold,underline
highlight Todo guifg=#000000 gui=bold,italic
highlight Visual guibg=#d0d0d0 guifg=#000000 gui=NONE
highlight IncSearch guibg=#d0d0d0 guifg=#000000 gui=NONE
| | |
| ▲ | alex-a-soto 4 days ago | parent [-] | | Thanks for sharing! Would it be alright if I try it out during our livestream this week? | | |
|
|
|
| |
| ▲ | dspillett 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | You have the option of a few greyscale levels, bold, pehaps italic, and depending on font maybe extra-bold and light. That should be enough for the essentials, though it will feel like a downgrade if you have got used to a richly colourful environment and rely on it for reasons other than liking it being pretty. | |
| ▲ | swinglock 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I don't require it myself but that's a concern, it's nice to have. Maybe someone can build an editor that uses different fonts within one file instead of different colors. Could be something out there for color blind folks already, though seeing no colors at all is unusual. But e-ink has grayscales so you could at least make comments a bit lighter, I think I'd be happy with that. | | |
| ▲ | balou23 4 days ago | parent | next [-] | | There's plenty of options available. A coworker of mine used to print out code for reviews. You can use italic, bold and underline as alternative to colors. Grayscale might work nicely for eInk too - for laser printers just thin/regular/bold probably works better. Other fonts... I could see myself being distracted by changing fonts in a document, except maybe for comment blocks. But for those italic/thin seems to work well already. Tried to find the tool... it's GNU enscript. Syntax highlighting for several languages, outputs to postscript. | | | |
| ▲ | OJFord 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | I'd do 3 greys, from lightest to darkest: comments, syntactical cruft like braces, semicolons, certain keywords, etc., and then 'actual' code, variable names and so on. Much more variation than that with 256 colours is mostly just making it pretty rather than offering helpful distinction imo. |
| |
| ▲ | 3abiton 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | That indeed would be my issue with it for programming. |
|
