▲ | account42 6 days ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Your link is about privacy issues in upstream software that Debian hasn't sufficiently worked around yet. The main advantage of the Distro model (as opposed to developer-maintained package ecosystems) is exactly that there is someone protecting you from questionable software "features". | |||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | amiga386 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
I don't think Debian intentionally shields you from privacy-invading software. Other distros may differ on this point. Debian does not mandate anything about privacy in its Policy Manual (which are the standards for selecting and packaging software that maintainers must adhere to): https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/search.html?q=priva... There's also no insistence on privacy in the Debian Social Contract or DFSG (not that these would be appropriate places for it, they're mainly about licensing) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | GrayShade 6 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Who protects you when the packagers decide to trust a shady CA (adding it to the root store) because it's used by the distro's infra? | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | pabs3 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Agreed, but it is definitely not enough, which is why some Debian folks packaged opensnitch. |