Exactly, this study was on antisemitism but you can imagine other countries doing this for other content.

By overloading the Meta ML loop, they’re guaranteeing that the censorship is from meta and not them.

Antisemitism, political posts, rallies, anti-government sentiment, it’s an assault on free speech. Add the fact that news organizations have basically bent the knee to this US Administration and it’s pretty much game over for free thinking journalism w/ access. (Good journalism doesn’t necessarily require red tape access)

▲

jhanschoo 4 days ago | parent [-]

Can you tell me what part of the article leads you to think that it is about antisemitism? Give me a few quotes.

	▲	reactordev 4 days ago \| parent [-]
		Sorry, what they perceive as antisemitism. Taking down of anything critical of their actions in Gaza, targeting Palestinians specifically. Speaking the truth isn’t antisemitism. However, that administration claims everything critical is antisemitism. The article was about takedown abuse by national actors. With a call out to a specific actor (and nods to the others). I used my power of deduction here. But it could very well be Israel asking to take down fuzzy cat videos. I very much support Israelites standing up and saying enough is enough. To hate. To violence. To Netanyahu. To Gaza. All of it. And Meta is happy to help organize (ugh)