▲ | lucb1e 5 days ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Besides what's public knowledge, I tend to put a bit of stock in our intelligence agency calling for PQ adoption for systems that need to remain confidential for 20 years or more edit: adding in some sources 2014: "between 2030 and 2040" according to https://www.aivd.nl/publicaties/publicaties/2014/11/20/infor... (404) via https://tweakers.net/reviews/5885/de-dreiging-van-quantumcom... (Dutch) 2021: "small chance it arrives by 2030" https://www.aivd.nl/documenten/publicaties/2021/09/23/bereid... (Dutch) 2025: "protect against ‘store now, decrypt later’ attacks by 2030", joint paper from 18 countries https://www.aivd.nl/binaries/aivd_nl/documenten/brochures/20... (English) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | wang_li 5 days ago | parent [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I don't want my government to keep secrets for 20 years. There is nothing I am OK with them doing that they can't be generally open about in time. Ex. the MLK files. No justification for the courts saying that the FBI files regarding MLK have to be kept under lock and key for 50 years. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|