When it comes to diffs (edits), Cursor is batch-oriented, while CC suggests one edit at a time and can be steered in real time.

That's a critical feature for keeping a human in the loop, preventing big detours and token waste.

▲

reasonableklout 6 days ago | parent [-]

How do you stay in the loop with CC? I find myself using it for the exact opposite use case: large features or greenfield projects where I can just let it rip autonomously for a while. I find the TUI awkward for reviewing code.

	▲	vemv 6 days ago \| parent [-]
		I stay in the loop by reviewing each edit and telling it to do something differently asap if something was wrong. The opposite approach is also possible: just hit the option (or .json setting) to accept all edits. Then you'd review the persisted changes using your favorite Git tool.