| ▲ | whaleofatw2022 5 days ago | ||||||||||||||||
Kinda interesting to ask what would have gone different if the infrastructure was in place to make electric cars 'good enough' as far as charging infrastructure. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | ben_w 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
As I understand it, the core problem back then was the batteries would mass half the car and lose a third of their maximum capacity in just 500 charging cycles. Back when cars were new, there was no infrastructure for petrol either, that was something you got in tiny quantities from a pharmacy. (The diesel engine can run on vegetable oil, but I don't think Mr Rudolf Diesel himself ever did that?) | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | userbinator 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
The batteries of the time were far less energy-dense and charged slowly. Lead-acid was the norm for EVs. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | kjs3 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Infrastructure requires demand, and energy density and convenience of a contemporary battery versus gas engine means that no one was going to demand batteries when ICE was an option. We only figured the downside much later. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||