| |
| ▲ | lostmsu 5 days ago | parent [-] | | This sounds backwards to me. The fact that I can show you a law book and you will be able to pass a law exam is a consequence of you being "generally intelligent". If I show these books to something less intelligent like a cow, or less general, like a CNN, they won't be able to do that. | | |
| ▲ | RugnirViking 5 days ago | parent [-] | | no, you're not understanding me. I'm not making any claim on whether they're any good at those subjects, merely that they are, objectively, trained on them | | |
| ▲ | lostmsu 5 days ago | parent [-] | | What is the relevance of this claim on its own if training on something alone is not sufficient for them to practice law, and you actually have to add cross-domain into picture for it to work, making it "general"? I still disagree though, they are not trained to practice law. They are trained to remember law, but practice come from general training to follow instructions. |
|
|
|
