I find it hard to empathize with these sorts of articles. I think in, in the spate of GPT-5 related content recently, I've been seeing a lot of articles that boil down to "I tried GPT-5 on a single hard question, and it gave an answer. This proves that all LLMs are useless." And I don't think I'm distorting the author's viewpoint. He goes on to say "This concludes all the testing for GPT5 I have to do" after conducting a single test.

This seems like particularly harsh criteria; what would happen if I applied this to other tools?

- I used Typescript, but it missed a bug that crashed prod, so it is "absolute horseshit"

- I used Rust, but one of my developers added an unsafe block, so it's trash.

> I used Typescript...it is "absolute horseshit"

That's right