| ▲ | mitchitized 7 days ago | |
Hol up How can it be AGPL and not provide full source? AGPL is like the most aggressive of the GPL license variants. If they somehow circumvented the intent behind this license that is a problem. | ||
| ▲ | Multicomp 7 days ago | parent | next [-] | |
Spitballing here but if it's their code that they have copyright on, they can license it to us as agpl, without binding themselves to those same terms. They have all rights as copyright holders regardless of a given license. | ||
| ▲ | victorbjorklund 6 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |
AGPL is a license to others and not the copyright owner. If you own the copyright you dont need the license at all. | ||