▲ | prasadjoglekar 4 days ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Au contraire, that is much closer to the definition of insurance. We don't want people to get bankrupt with an unforseen medical issue like cancer. Insurance should cover that. Routine care, including shit that's a little unlucky should be paid for out of pocket. In the US, health care and health insurance have become synonymous such that all the good bits of insurance are out the door and all the bad ones have stayed. And polluted the true cost of getting simple, routine care. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | tossandthrow 4 days ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
In that vain health insurance is never insurance. Getting a kid is not an accident for most modern people, and should never be seen as an event that could bankrupt anybody. Hence, deferring to the definition of insurance is futile. Then again - the US is the only country I know of that insists that health is something you insure. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | mantas 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
3k out-of-pocket for a random mishap could easily get many people bankrupt. I did scratch an eyeball recently. The cost turned out to be €50 for drops which ain’t covered by single-payer insurance. 3k out of pocket would be pretty bad even naming nice salary. And could cause big issues to a massive portion of people. |