▲ | fossuser 9 days ago | |||||||||||||
It’s better than that because it includes the content - more akin to searching and putting the result you find in the comments as a guess. The anti AI HN comments are the new anti Bitcoin - your replies are much worse than someone sharing the gpt output. | ||||||||||||||
▲ | Wojtkie 9 days ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||
I would disagree. It's been shown recently how over-use of AI impacts cognition; "use it or lose it" mostly. I immediately ignore any "I asked ChatGPT..." comments because I do not know the prompt used, if the claims were verified by the poster, or the quality of the sources. If you want to offload your critical thinking to a black-box model, be my guest. A google link at least allows me to verify sources and use my brain. | ||||||||||||||
▲ | ThrowawayR2 8 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||
From https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33950747 : "...HN has never allowed bots or generated comments. If we have to, we'll add that explicitly to https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html, but I'd say it already follows from the rules that are in there. ..." | ||||||||||||||
▲ | mardef 8 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||
These aren't anti-AI comments. We're on a forum talking person to person. It is antithetical to just spout "AI said this" repeatedly when the entire point of this place is human discourse. It's like having a group conversation in person and one member of the group contributes nothing but things they read off Google. | ||||||||||||||
|