▲ | jrmg 4 days ago | ||||||||||||||||
> being forced to buy insurance with a premium so high my risk adjusted return for self insuring is actually higher This is how all insurance works though. Everyone pays in, and those unlucky enough to experience catastrophic problems get a way bigger payout than those who don’t. Pooling risk is the entire point of insurance. Without that, it’s not insurance, it’s just a payment system, and those unfortunate enough to have big problems have to pay more. Perhaps your views of what a society should be ‘for’ means you think that the unfortunate just having to pay more is fair, but I don’t. | |||||||||||||||||
▲ | mathiaspoint 4 days ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||
That infact is not how insurance works. You don't charge low risk people insane premia because it isn't fair. My car insurance is far cheaper than my sister's for this reason for example. Even if I had an event (outside something way out in the tails where I might not even want the treatment anyway if it's free because my QoL suffers too much either way) I'm coming out with a loss because I'm forced to subsidize care for high risk people as well as very bloated administration. Having the insurance doesn't make sense. even when you're one of the people that needs healthcare Insurance is an instrument for trading volatility not socializing costs. Those are radically different things. | |||||||||||||||||
|