▲ | LeoPanthera 6 days ago | ||||||||||||||||
"Some phones will silently strip GPS data from images when apps without location permission try to access them." Uh... good? | |||||||||||||||||
▲ | steve_adams_86 6 days ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
I'm torn. Maybe a better approach would be a prompt saying "you're giving access to images with embedded location data. Do you want to keep the location data in the images, or strip the location data in this application?" I might not want an application to know my current, active location. But it might be useful for it to get location data from images I give it access to. I do think if we have to choose between stripping nothing or always stripping if there's no location access, this is the correct and safe solution. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
▲ | a96 6 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Kind of. But that means any file that goes through that mechanism may be silently modified. Which is evil. | |||||||||||||||||
▲ | account42 3 days ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
It is cursed because now the photo management app needs to ask for the permission to constantly track you instead of only getting location of a limited set of past points where you specifically chose to take a photo. Besides giving malicious photo app developers an excuse for these permissions, it also contributes to permission fatigue by training to give random applications wide permissions. |