▲ | electric_muse 8 days ago | |
That's ironic. I think local MCPs are an auth nightmare. Just think of all those plaintext auth tokens sitting in well-known locations on your machine. It's a black hat dream. We'll see, but I think commercial use of local MCPs is going to be constrained to use cases that only make sense if the MCP is local (e.g. it requires local file access). For everything else, the only commercially reasonable way to use them is going to be remote streamable HTTP MCPs running in isolated containers And even then, you need some management and identity plane. So they're going to likely be accessed via an enterprise gateway/proxy to handle things like: - composition -- bundling multiple MCPs into one for easier connection - identities per-user / per-agent - generation of rotatable tokens for headless agents - filtering what features (tools, prompts, resources) flow through into LLM context - basic security features, like tool description whitelisting to prevent rug pulls MCP is only a protocol, after all. It's not meant to be a batteries-included product. |