| ▲ | sebast_bake 9 days ago |
| Timeless rules… They can be applied generally to large organisations, and serve as an excellent summary of symptoms of elite blindness |
|
| ▲ | SwtCyber 9 days ago | parent | next [-] |
| Makes you wonder if it's elite blindness or just the gravitational pull of power structures repeating themselves |
| |
| ▲ | burnt-resistor 9 days ago | parent [-] | | Because most people will silently endure abuse for far too long that teach billionaires, politicians, and celebrities that there are no boundaries. They can be pedophiles and pederasts, shoot people in the street, and lawlessly disband food aid organizations (killing 13M+) without consequences. (And receive more investment because they've wired their lairs for video and audio recording to collect Kompromat.) | | |
| ▲ | pstuart 9 days ago | parent [-] | | It's all powered by hate, which itself is powered by ignorance and lack of critical reasoning skills. | | |
| ▲ | burnt-resistor 8 days ago | parent [-] | | Yep. It's the insulated, disconnected insouciance and unbounded selfishness that comes with a distinct lack of consideration, vulnerability, and theory of mind. To restore survival and decency, redistribution of wealth above $200 million needs to happen in all nations to put the morbidly rich on "GLP-1" and an incremental tax to prevent excessive wealth hoarding. Of course, this also requires the political coercion or overthrowing of corrupt regimes that won't allow fair, democratic elections. |
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | TheOtherHobbes 9 days ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Let's not forget the monarch at the time had serious mental health issues. |
| |
| ▲ | jjk166 9 days ago | parent | next [-] | | King George III didn't start really start showing symptoms of mental illness until 1788, and it was only during temporary periods until 1810. There had been a brief episode in 1765, but it was poorly documented, and is described more like a depressive episode than the mania he suffered later in life. All the same, during the period leading up to and during the American Revolution, he was his regular self. It's also worth noting that by this point in time the monarch was not really the decision maker for most affairs of state. While he was likely the most politically powerful monarch after the Glorious Revolution, Parliament was nevertheless still calling the shots. | |
| ▲ | doitLP 9 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | True but he wasn’t ruling like the kings of old. Parliament was the governing body and was very powerful even if the king still retain more power of redress and authority than he does today | |
| ▲ | lc9er 9 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | Seems to be common at the extreme levels of wealth |
|
