Spending grew about 8% a year under New Labour on average, which doesn't seem like sabotage to me.

Also if both dominant political parties are supposedly so against the NHS, why don't they just abolish it?

HPsquared 6 days ago | parent | next [-]

They need to be sneaky. Same with a lot of other unpopular policies which nevertheless (somehow...) have support from "both sides".

▲

tremon 6 days ago | parent | prev [-]

They need the public to (nominally) assent to it first, otherwise it'd be suicide. They're using the republican playbook: overburden the sector with tasks and regulations while underfunding it, and allow for private competition that is not subject to the same regulatory burden. Then in a decade or so, you can claim that the "free market" works better and the public won't kick up too much of a fuss.

	▲	eru 6 days ago \| parent [-]
		That seems like a weird conspiracy. Why would the parties secretly want to do something that the voters don't like? Are they not power-hungry? By the way, how is that the republican playbook? What does any of this have to do with the desire to remove King Charles as the head of government? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republicanism_in_the_United_Ki...