That is why I do not like the American traffic signaling system. When the light turns red cross traffic has a two to three second delay. My feeling is that if people knew the cross traffic would go immediately when the light turned red they would certainly stop. But right now they know there's a buffer so they just run the red light.

▲

josephcsible 7 days ago | parent | next [-]

Wouldn't you need the delay even if everyone drove perfectly? Isn't the point of it to give time for cars that have already entered the intersection to exit it, since the light turning red just means you're no longer allowed to enter?

▲

WalterBright 7 days ago | parent [-]

Generally, cross drivers pay attention to other cars in the intersection and don't just drive into them.

	▲	illiac786 6 days ago \| parent [-]
		And cars already in the intersection have a momentum, you’d need quite a powerful car to hit them (and you would have to do it on purpose)

▲

WalterBright 7 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Around here the power goes out to the lights now and then. Interestingly, the traffic flows smoother and faster without the lights! Even the arterials! It's amazing! Drivers simply politely cooperate with each other.

(The same thing happens when a traffic cop handles the intersection.)

I'm always assured that the city traffic light engineers know what they're doing and design the lights for maximum flow. They do no such thing. They are either incompetent or deliberately set things up to impede the flow of traffic.

Most of the lights now have cameras on them. Would it be so hard to connect them up to AI with the goal of "maximize throughput"? Imagine how much gas would be saved. It would be tremendous!

	▲	laurencerowe 7 days ago \| parent \| next [-]
		At 4-way stops I find myself incredibly frustrated at the lack of roundabouts in the US since the traffic moves so much more slowly. But for high traffic intersections traffic lights are just more efficient since they let more cars through on average. I think much of the issue is that by solving it at one intersection you simply move the problem to the next intersection. I'm pretty sure putting a roundabout at the 280/Page Mill Road intersection would improve throughput but nobody would get to work any quicker since the choke point is the next intersection along.
	▲	josephcsible 7 days ago \| parent \| prev \| next [-]
		> Interestingly, the traffic flows smoother and faster without the lights! I agree with that at off-peak times, but when lights malfunction at peak times, that seems to make traffic a lot worse.
	▲	elliottkember 7 days ago \| parent \| prev \| next [-]
		Moving to the US, the traffic light system was a big culture shock for me. No major/minor dendritic road system laid out like a tree like I was used to — more like right angles everywhere and so many delays. Traffic lights on every single intersection. So inefficient. And when you mention it, a surprising number of people say “that would never work here. People don’t know how to drive”. So little faith!
	▲	1718627440 6 days ago \| parent \| prev \| next [-]
		That's because traffic lines exist for safety not efficiency. They guarantee a time during which you can drive through the crossing without looking, while introducing idle time.
	▲	petre 7 days ago \| parent \| prev \| next [-]
		That's how the traffic in India actually works. No sudden moves, no surprises, no AI, everybody cooperates.
	▲	ars 7 days ago \| parent \| prev \| next [-]
		This has been found over and over, the more traffic control devices the worse the driving.
	▲	andrewshadura 7 days ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		The Netherlands has it.