Humans die under 10g for more than a few minutes. Admittedly, we could position the humans to be in the optimal direction, but even 2g sustained for months would undoubtedly cause issues.

I picked 25G as it would be an insane but reasonable acceleration, and time is always a factor. Trimming 2 years off of a voyage might seem worthless on an intergalactic scale, since once you are more than a few solar systems away you're on the scale of AI scouts and generation ships, but for a close star like Alpha Centauri, 2 years (each way) might be the difference between a one way death march and the possibility of a heroic return home.

▲ zeven7 4 days ago | parent | next [-]

Grandfather paradox says the riders on the ship won’t experience most of the time of the ride

▲ nobody9999 3 days ago | parent [-]

>Grandfather paradox says the riders on the ship won’t experience most of the time of the ride

No. The Grandfather Paradox[0] says nothing of the kind:

   The consistency paradox, commonly known as the grandfather paradox, occurs 
   when the past is changed in any way.[5] The paradox of changing the past 
   stems from modal logic: if it is necessarily true that the past happened in a 
   certain way, then it is false and impossible for the past to have occurred in 
   any other way, so any change to the past would be a paradox.[13] Consistency 
   paradoxes occur whenever any change to the past is possible.[6]
   
   A common example given is a time traveler killing their grandfather before 
   their parents' conception, thus preventing the conception of themselves. If 
   the traveler were not born, they could not kill their grandfather; therefore, 
   the grandfather proceeds to beget the traveler's ancestor who begets the 
   traveler. This scenario is self-contradictory.[5] One proposed resolution for 
   this paradox is that a time traveller can do anything that did happen, but 
   cannot do anything that did not happen.[5] Another proposed resolution is 
   simply that time travel is impossible.[14]

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Temporal_paradox

	▲	zeven7 2 days ago \| parent [-]
		Sorry I spoke quickly. I meant the twin paradox and reached for the wrong label

▲ JumpCrisscross 6 days ago | parent | prev [-]

> Humans die under 10g for more than a few minutes

With no air?

	▲	BizarroLand 5 hours ago \| parent [-]
		It's not about the air. Its about our fundamental squishyness. At 10g, a 150lb man would weigh 1,500 lbs. His heart isn't strong enough to move blood that suddenly weighs 90lbs/gallon that also has to push other blood that also weighs that same amount. His blood vessels, paper thin and easily torn under normal weight, suddenly have 10 times the amount of pressure to resist. He's fine for a few moments, jet pilots experience short bursts of 10g during flights quite often, occasionally more. Might pass out after 10-20 seconds, but after 10 minutes, his brain, starved of oxygen and squished under its own weight, ceases to function. His heart or his blood vessels rip and tear from the strain, and his body falls apart inside of its own skin. It's not pretty, but it would probably be a fairly painless way to go. Getting back to your question, his ability to breathe is not relevant under those situations. The absence of oxygen would accelerate his demise no more than it would under any other situation.