Introducing gpt-oss

organsnyder 2 days ago | parent | next [-]

Discussed here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44800746

	▲	dang 2 days ago \| parent [-]
		Ok, I've put https://openai.com/index/introducing-gpt-oss/ in the top text there as well. Thanks!

▲

miguelpaoc 20 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I wrote a detailed breakdown of the models and why this release is a big deal — especially for devs who want to run or fine-tune LLMs locally: https://medium.com/@miguel.paracuellos.inf/openai-just-went-...

Curious how others are thinking of using these — would love to hear your setups.

▲

zoey123 14 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

[dead]

▲

alexshendi 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

[flagged]

▲

rectang 2 days ago | parent [-]

Open Source Software.

▲

elif 2 days ago | parent | next [-]

FOSS minus freedom

▲

tptacek 2 days ago | parent | next [-]

They're Apache licensed.

▲

rafram 2 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Nobody wants to use a model with a "FOSS" - as in copyleft - license, since you could conceivably need to license anything it's deeply integrated in under a compatible license. The gpt-oss README specifically mentions the lack of "copyleft restrictions or patent risk" as a selling point.

	▲	JoshTriplett 2 days ago \| parent [-]
		FOSS does not imply copyleft. Permissive licenses and copyleft licenses are both FOSS.

▲

speedgoose 2 days ago | parent | prev [-]

But it’s open weights.

	▲	reactordev 2 days ago \| parent [-]
		obviously super software.

▲

tonyhart7 2 days ago | parent | prev [-]

only 128k context length???