▲ | gorhill 8 days ago | |||||||
Those webpages used to "test" blockers are frowned upon, see: https://x.com/gorhill/status/1583581072197312512 There are many reasons that sort of online tools are not able to reliably test a content blocker: - Many content blockers are designed to fool pages to think no content blocker is installed - Content blockers filter according to real, actual cases, not synthetic cases used in their tests | ||||||||
▲ | eikenberry 8 days ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
I just tested with Firefox and uBlock Origin in the stricter "medium mode" and got a score of 1%. So yeah, I don't think these test pages are that great. | ||||||||
▲ | saagarjha 8 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
Would you be supportive of an "adblock test page" that literally just reports if the adblocker is working correctly, rather than how good it is? Like maybe an EICAR-like rule that is added to EasyList that matches an element on that page? | ||||||||
|