Hi everyone,

I'm building an AI recruitment platform and your comments really resonated with me - they really show why the current approach is broken.

We actually created this mess by making applications too easy - technology removed friction in the hiring process and now people click apply to jobs without even reading the JD.

Worst still with genAI people that may not be a good fit for the roles they apply, use AI to tweak their CVs to match the job descriptions and become a good fit on paper.

The results is that companies get flooded with irrelevant applications and respond with more friction, whether that is more screening rounds, more interviewing or AI interviews that add the friction back.

We're trying to solve this by adding good friction instead of bad friction. The AI should be working for candidates too, not just extracting value from them. Would love your thoughts on what would actually make an AI interview worthwhile from a candidate perspective.