Remix.run Logo
snvzz 8 days ago

>They are incredibly expensive, costing $250,000 to $500,000 per year.

No way they cost that much to make.

Big pharma is out of control.

zozbot234 7 days ago | parent | next [-]

The first dose costs billions to make, every dose after that might only cost a few cents. It all averages out.

abeppu 7 days ago | parent [-]

From a study looking at cost-effectiveness of tafamidis:

> Orphan drugs enjoy substantial pricing power because there are few or no therapeutic competitors. As a result, discounts off the list price, if any, tend to be small. In a recent study of 50 patients receiving tafamidis, the mean (SD) cost of a 30-day supply was $23,485 ($2); the resulting annual cost of $281,820 is greater than the $225,000 list price we assumed. In fact, U.S. prices for specialty pharmaceuticals typically experience substantial year-on-year price increases during the period of market exclusivity.

I mean, we shouldn't be surprised what happens to prices when the law goes out of its way to create a monopoly.

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8170666/

robertlagrant 7 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

You should've seen how unaffordable cars were 100 years ago.

defrost 7 days ago | parent | next [-]

The Ford Model T sold for $260 in 1925, which is $4,056 in 2021 dollars.

Prices were higher in 1922, and the Model T was basic and mass produced leading to a falling price.

Across the board, in 1922: https://www.1920-30.com/automobiles/1922-car-prices.html

jaybrendansmith 7 days ago | parent | prev [-]

You are missing the point, poster should have said 200 years ago. The point is that these treatments cost so much because they must be invented and tested. About 50% of that drug cost is the invention, 50% is the testing (in clinical trials) and .0000000001% is the cost to manufacture.

Am4TIfIsER0ppos 7 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Why don't you make some and sell it for a mere 200k?