| ▲ | snvzz 8 days ago |
| >They are incredibly expensive, costing $250,000 to $500,000 per year. No way they cost that much to make. Big pharma is out of control. |
|
| ▲ | zozbot234 7 days ago | parent | next [-] |
| The first dose costs billions to make, every dose after that might only cost a few cents. It all averages out. |
| |
| ▲ | abeppu 7 days ago | parent [-] | | From a study looking at cost-effectiveness of tafamidis: > Orphan drugs enjoy substantial pricing power because there are few or no therapeutic competitors. As a result, discounts off the list price, if any, tend to be small. In a recent study of 50 patients receiving tafamidis, the mean (SD) cost of a 30-day supply was $23,485 ($2); the resulting annual cost of $281,820 is greater than the $225,000 list price we assumed. In fact, U.S. prices for specialty pharmaceuticals typically experience substantial year-on-year price increases during the period of market exclusivity. I mean, we shouldn't be surprised what happens to prices when the law goes out of its way to create a monopoly. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8170666/ |
|
|
| ▲ | robertlagrant 7 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| You should've seen how unaffordable cars were 100 years ago. |
| |
| ▲ | defrost 7 days ago | parent | next [-] | | The Ford Model T sold for $260 in 1925, which is $4,056 in 2021 dollars. Prices were higher in 1922, and the Model T was basic and mass produced leading to a falling price. Across the board, in 1922: https://www.1920-30.com/automobiles/1922-car-prices.html | |
| ▲ | jaybrendansmith 7 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | You are missing the point, poster should have said 200 years ago. The point is that these treatments cost so much because they must be invented and tested. About 50% of that drug cost is the invention, 50% is the testing (in clinical trials) and .0000000001% is the cost to manufacture. |
|
|
| ▲ | Am4TIfIsER0ppos 7 days ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Why don't you make some and sell it for a mere 200k? |