| ▲ | margalabargala 6 days ago | |
> They get 300 resumes. 299 of them need to go away. It has been like this forever. That AI is doing it does not change anything really. That's not really true. From the candidate, there's the effort to submit a resume (low), and then the effort to personally get on a video call and spend 45 minutes talking (high). Discarding 290 out of the 300 resumes without talking to the candidate is way more acceptable, because the effort required from the company is about the same as the effort required by the candidate. Asking the candidate to do an interview with an AI flips this; the company can en masse require high effort from the candidate without matching it. | ||
| ▲ | sumtechguy 6 days ago | parent [-] | |
> Asking the candidate to do an interview with an AI flips this; the company can en masse require high effort from the candidate without matching it. I don't disagree. These systems are already awful to get into. Some have dozens of pages you have to fill in for your 'resume'. Just for at the end to ask for docx file of your resume. So we probably will get that PLUS this AI stuff (you know just in case /s). | ||