> Using AI to conduct "interviews" is detestable behavior that devalues humanity overall and possess no dignity.

I mean, strictly speaking, the AI interviewer is a net positive, as on the whole, it reduces the time humans take to do something. But only if they keep the same 'interview' rate as before. Not likely.

However, I agree with you here too. It's the damned reciprocity of it all. For me, it was that I knew (and was proven correct) that the AI interview was pointless; that I was talking at the void. The company never got back to me outside of the standard form email. It never mattered if I wore a suit to the interview and minded my manners or if I was naked and screaming obscenities in the 'interview'. Likely my face and voice will now be used in some training dataset against my wishes after some EULA gets changed without my notice. It's so denigrating. I'll never apply there again, even if they get rid of the AI interviews, it's left such a bad taste in my mouth.