The problem is now the company has no skin in the game. If the company spent a large amount of time & energy vetting the candidate then it is a more equal transaction.

▲

tomjakubowski 6 days ago | parent | next [-]

What's the $ cost of running these AI interviewer models for the interview + candidate evaluation? Time not being fungible the way money is, it still feels asymmetric - but it isn't like the firm using an AI interviewer is spending nothing.

▲

newswasboring 6 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Yeah but that is true for any form of interview, if there is a leet code problem set it's the same no? So is if they ask you to write a few answers down in a form.

	▲	withinboredom 6 days ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Every company I’ve worked at has spent more people-time reviewing the submitted code or reviewing the answers than the applicant spent doing the work.
	▲	Balgair 6 days ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		I mean, yeah, I agree with you here. Coding tests and even the masses of resume retyping are in the exact same boat, and I think we all hate it because of that. The asymmetry is denigrating.