> Claude will hallucinate things about Rust code because it’s a statistical model, not a static analysis tool.

I think that's the point of the article.

In a dynamic language or a compiled language, its going to be hallucinating either way. If you vibe coding the errors are caught earlier so you can vibe code them away before it blows up at run time.

Static analysis tools like rustc and clippy are powerful, but there are large classes of errors that escape those analyses — e.g. things like off-by-one errors.