▲ | cduzz 4 days ago | |||||||
Right -- this is why I use the analogy of TSMC -- chip fabs are also extremely expensive, for similar reasons. What are the relative costs of the making die set, the press, and setting up and doing a run of stampings, and the facility and employees to actually house the whole kit? As of right now, if you need to make a car and you don't have a NUMI or similar retired automotive plant sitting around, it's going to be expensive. What about the hydroforming process? I guess smaller car makers from the 60s that did make low volume sheet metal cars didn't need to pass crash tests. Probably The Telo people should just team up with ineos.... | ||||||||
▲ | numpad0 2 days ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
The process of a 3D model -> dies > panels that match the model is iterative. Tesla apparently cheaped out on that optimization paths and they had lots of issues towards rear left corner of cars, somehow on both Model S and X. ODMs like Magna-Steyr and Valmet also exist. They take your plan, build some, and send to you on a ship from Central Europe. | ||||||||
▲ | convolvatron 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
except the fab pays the tooling cost once per process and the tool and die company charges once per design. I've actually worked a little on hydroforming, but unless you're thinking of a different kind, it was labor intensive, and prone to crinkling in bad spots. we basically concluded that we used less time and got a better result with an English. which would probably run at least $10k for a car body, if you could find someone willing to work for that low an hourly rate. | ||||||||
|