> Yes, and it's not written in common lisp, or lisp at all for that matter. It's written in C with an embedded lisp (elisp).

Isn't it the case that something like 70%+ of all Emacs' source code is actually elisp?

The fact that C code embeds a Lisp doesn't make the code then written in elisp C code right? Otherwise by that logic Java code is actually bytecode or something.