| ▲ | cosmic_cheese 5 days ago |
| Yep. Trucks that actually get used as trucks look like it with dings, scratches, and scuffs because they’re tools, not toys. Ironically they’re also often old small models that owners have been keeping running forever because they’re cheap to fix, practical, and easy to park unlike their embiggened modern counterparts. |
|
| ▲ | SilverElfin 5 days ago | parent [-] |
| > Trucks that actually get used as trucks look like it with dings, scratches, and scuffs because they’re tools, not toys. Not really. Lots of people use trucks and keep them in pristine condition too. Beds have liners now to keep them looking new. And you aren’t getting random dings on the outside unless you drive into things. |
| |
| ▲ | cosmic_cheese 5 days ago | parent [-] | | The amount of effort required to keep them pristine scales with the quantity and intensity of the work performed, no? The most serious truck drivers probably aren’t going to have time to buff out every little mark when it’s going to get covered in them again on the job tomorrow. | | |
| ▲ | XorNot 5 days ago | parent [-] | | People who drive a truck for work aren't going to crash it into things all the time, what are you even talking about? Do you regularly crash your car into things while driving it? Like on a daily basis? Like..you get that mud and dust just wash off, and the reason to wash them off is that once dried they can mess up the paint over a long period which then gives you a rust problem you really don't want? | | |
| ▲ | cosmic_cheese 5 days ago | parent [-] | | The people I know who drive trucks are doing things where constant small bits of damage are inevitable. Think kicked up gravel, tree branches scraping against the body, unintentionally bumping up against the truck with equipment, etc. Damage is frequent enough that it’s one of the reasons they find buying a new truck difficult to justify and would rather buy something that’s got some visible wear and tear on it already. |
|
|
|