Fun demo but the model that's used seems to be pretty stupid:

> What's the best way to get to space?

>> Unfortunately, it's not currently possible for humans to travel to space in the same way that astronauts do. While there have been several manned missions to space, such as those to the International Space Station, the technology and resources required to make interstellar travel feasible are still in the early stages of development.

>> Currently, the fastest spacecraft is the Apollo missions, which took around 77 hours to reach the Moon. From there, they traveled to other planets, but the distances between them are so great that even at high speeds, it would take many years to reach them.

>> As for traveling to space itself, there are no commercial or private companies that offer space travel services, and the cost of such a journey is estimated to be in the tens of millions of dollars per person.

>> However, there are some concepts and technologies being explored that might one day make space travel more accessible and affordable. For example, private companies like SpaceX and Blue Origin are working on developing reusable rockets that could potentially take people to space more quickly and reliably.

>> But for now, let's just say that space travel is still in the future, and we'll have to wait a bit longer for humans to venture into the cosmos!

▲

khalic 21 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Are you kidding me? 500MB? And it’s that coherent?

▲

tomrod a day ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It shows an interface of what could be.

▲

andreinwald 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It works on small Llama-3.2-1B model, specially for less powerfull GPU devices

▲

wongarsu a day ago | parent [-]

The answer is still terrible for the model size. Maybe it's the 4 bit quantization, smaller models tend to react worse to that

For reference, [1] is what stock quen3-0.6B would answer. Not a perfect answer, but much better at nearly half the number of parameters

1: https://markdownpastebin.com/?id=7ad4ad9f325d4354a858480abdc...

	▲	KTibow a day ago \| parent [-]
		It's likely the quantization on "Llama-3.2-1B-Instruct-q4f16_1-MLC". inference.net generated this more coherent answer: https://hst.sh/ovilewofox.md

▲

fooker a day ago | parent | prev [-]

It’s broadly correct, if you interpret ‘humans’ as ordinary humans who are not astronauts.

	▲	dragonwriter a day ago \| parent \| next [-]
		That generous redefinition.of “humans” deals with only the error in the first sentence of the response; the rest is still not “broadly correct” even with it in place.
	▲	wongarsu a day ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Blue Origin is built on taking ordinary humans to space. So is/was Virgin Galactic, though they are in a bit of a transitionary phase right now. SpaceX is also willing, they might even take you on a flyby of the moon if you bring money and patience (iirc the last customer lost patience). Basically just ring up your favorite multi-billionaire's space program. And while the estimated price would be correct for SpaceX, rumored prices for Blue Origin's New Shepard are only in the hundreds of thousands per seat Edit: also the "but if you do that you are an astronaut, so it's still true that only astronauts can do that" loophole was closed when the FAA redefined the word astronaut in 2021. At least if you follow their definition of the word