| ▲ | haunter 5 days ago |
| Why Discord though? Truly independent project, keep big corps away, future of the web at stake here yada yada yet using the most walled garden of walled gardens. If there is no publicly accessible and searchable archive then might as well not exist. |
|
| ▲ | mnmalst 5 days ago | parent | next [-] |
| I think Andreas made a comment about this in some of his videos along the lines of: It's where the most people are. |
|
| ▲ | rs186 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Would like to hear your suggestion of an alternative that: * has a modern interface and allow people to communicate efficiently * does not cost a fortune to use * has good moderation tools * supports multiple channels * has enough built-in moderation so that spam/illegal content is minimal etc. |
| |
| ▲ | Barrin92 4 days ago | parent | next [-] | | Zulip. Open source, self-hostable, looks decent and not only does it have every feature that discord has, their version of threads/topics to spin off individual conversations is extremely well done. | | | |
| ▲ | aledue 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | Zulip? |
|
|
| ▲ | bowsamic 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Andreas has made it clear he’s not interested in free software politics. That’s not his battle |
| |
| ▲ | freedomben 4 days ago | parent | next [-] | | That's fine, but I don't see what free software has to do with searchability and persistence of the backlog | | |
| ▲ | bowsamic 4 days ago | parent [-] | | I didn’t say it did. The person I replied to mentioned free software adjacent principles |
| |
| ▲ | xpe 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | Doesn't LadyBird get a lot of support because it is FOSS? Seems useful to lean into that frame of mind then! |
|
|
| ▲ | ivanjermakov 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Because network effect. You either use Discord or nobody comes. |
| |
| ▲ | xpe 4 days ago | parent [-] | | > You either use Discord or nobody comes. WAT? Not even close to true. A lot of people gravitate to other discussion forums. Some even dislike chat-style "communities" that they steer clear. (Someone can find market research if we want to pin it down more.) My summary (exaggerated for effect): Discord is a time waster. Slack is Stockholm Syndrome. GitHub Issues is comfortable. Zulip is lesser-known but great and FOSS. So many of these products have redefined our frame of mind for how we interact, for better or (let's be frank) worse. | | |
|
|
| ▲ | 42lux 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Because it's chat if you treat it like a knowledge base it's on you. |
| |
| ▲ | MaxBarraclough 3 days ago | parent | next [-] | | The distinction isn't always clear. If you're studying the history of the Linux kernel, you'll want to make use of its mailing list archives. | |
| ▲ | globular-toast 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | If that were true than IRC would be absolutely perfect. | | |
| ▲ | dotnetcarpenter 4 days ago | parent | next [-] | | SerenityOS used IRC but when Andreas changed to discord he saw a massive influx of developers. I assume that it was a no brainer to use discord when forking Ladybird... | |
| ▲ | perching_aix 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | So would be Discord, and so it is. |
| |
| ▲ | frou_dh 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | Come on, it's inevitable that chat history becomes a knowledge base to some extent even if the participants are aware of this pitfall. | | |
|