▲ | makeitdouble 5 days ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||
> violating a contract isn't against the law Being binding is kinda of the whole purpose of a contract. If violating it is void under the law the company should change lawyers. To put your argument under a different angle, there are many written laws you can violate with very limited consequences if any, but they are still laws. Contracts aren't written by the country, and enforcing them is civil matter so there's nuance, but violating an enforceable contract you provably agreed to is against the law. Whether you can get away with it is another question. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | codingdave 5 days ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
There are two types of law. Contracts are civil law. Breaking them does not break criminal law. Civil vs. criminal law has different procedures, different burdens of proof, and different potential consequences. When it comes to contracts, no, there are no "laws", there are agreements between parties that can be enforced if taken to court, and in that sense they are binding. But breaking them does not break any law... it just breaks an agreement. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|