Is it the standard of proof?

Preponderance (US), Balance of Probabilities (CA, UK, Ireland, SG, AU, NZ, PH, SA, NG), extinción de dominio (MX, CO, BR)?

▲

marcosdumay 2 days ago | parent [-]

It is that the asset can be forfeit before a judicial decision. And as a second, that there is no requirement to involve the asset owner in a judicial proceeding.

Civil forfeiture is a hot topic all over the world. But the US has Executive forfeiture in practice.

	▲	esbranson a day ago \| parent [-]
		> in practice One of the differences is that the US has PACER (Public Access to Court Electronic Records), that in practice we have a clue. Since the 80s. It adds up.