| ▲ | Etheryte 2 days ago | ||||||||||||||||
The title doesn't say nor imply anything about her getting it back though? It says her assets were seized which is correct. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | peeters 2 days ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||
The article itself has the title: > The FBI Seized Her $40,000 Without Explaining Why. She Fought Back Against That Practice—and Lost I think it's decent, but still a bit ambiguous. Less ambiguous than if it just said "She Fought Back and Lost". My initial assumption formed by the title was still that she didn't get her money back. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||