How is this point relevant to my point?

It seems to be completely unrelated to the tautology.

Your argument is that elites who wish to change the status quo, but can’t for whatever reason, aren’t really elites. I agree to a point.

I argue even if the above is true, they truly are elites if the word actually describes anyone accurately and not just aspirationally, and that there are too many cooks in the kitchen for one to rise above the din.