..but but... I've never had the opportunity or helpful environment to focus on learning languages and focused on other skillsets.

Other efforts to try and coordinate the time, finances and a team to accomplish the projects that I have in mind also failed miserably..

Am I (for example) so bad to believe that I could possibly accomplish some of my dreams with the help of LLMs as another attempt to be an accomplished human being?

(partly /s but partly not)

▲ munificent 5 days ago | parent | next [-]

I made no moral claims about whether it's bad to want to have code without wanting to go through the experience of writing it.

I want a nice lawn, but I don't want to mow it myself. I pay a landscaper. I don't think that makes me a bad person.

But it does make me a different person from someone who enjoys the process of manicuring a lawn.

▲ kevindamm 6 days ago | parent | prev [-]

The more powerful the tool, the more responsible its wielder should behave.

Ideally. In reality, that's impossible to enforce.

▲ x______________ 6 days ago | parent [-]

  >The more powerful the tool, the more responsible its wielder should behave.

I will argue that this is a false pretense, in part that you say it's impossible to enforce, but also for the fact that it does not happen in reality.

Anyone with a will to an objective will utilize any tools at their disposal, only the observer from another perspective will judge that this is 'good or not'. To the beholder, this has become the only way to achieve their goals.

An anecdote goes by the lady who was using a ww2 era hand grenade to crush spices in her kitchen for decades without anything happening. Goals were met and nothing bad happened but general consensus states that this is bad for many reasons, to which nothing happened.

Maybe it's not only responsibility, but the capability for one to understand the situation one is in and what is at their disposal. ..and a hint of 'don't be evil' that leads to good outcomes despite what everyone thinks.

▲

kevindamm 6 days ago | parent [-]

> Maybe it's not only responsibility, but the capability for one to understand the situation one is in and what is at their disposal. ..and a hint of 'don't be evil' that leads to good outcomes despite what everyone thinks.

This understanding, and hint of broader/benevolent perspective, is what I meant by responsibility.

I'm not so naive as to expect it in general but I have known it to exist, that there are people who respect the responsibility implicit in proper use of their tools. The world is a labyrinth of prisoners' dilemmas so I get that there's a reasonable argument for being "irresponsible" whatever that means in the context.

	▲	x______________ 6 days ago \| parent [-]
		For the greater good, would you go as far as saying that the act of responsibility comes from the top, the people who lead, and those in the public spotlight? Or would this ideology need to be indoctrinated in educational systems? Or do we have to hope and pray that each and every human born would need to go through the same process of learning and understanding to reach this level of responsibility?