> They aren't useless. Otherwise, ChatGPT would have died a long time back

Isn’t the entire industry being fuelled by orders of magnitude more VC funding than revenue?

anshumankmr 5 days ago | parent | next [-]

>Isn’t the entire industry being fuelled by orders of magnitude more VC funding than revenue?

Because people want to use it, right? And it is a matter of time before they start limiting the ChatGPT "free" or "logged out" accounts, I feel. In the consumer AI chat apps, it is still the dominant brand, at least in my anecdotal experience, and they will basically make the Plus version the one version of the app to definitely use.

Plus they are planning on selling it to enterprises, and at least a couple of them are signing up for sure.

	▲	johnisgood 5 days ago \| parent [-]
		I think they are already limiting / nerfing "free" vs "logged out" vs "paid" vs "non-commercial".

▲

arthens 5 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Isn't that an argument against the sustainability of the LLM business model rather than their usefulness?

People use them because they are useful, not because they are VC funded.

	▲	skydhash 5 days ago \| parent [-]
		When the product is free, that put the barrier at ground level. I have more confidence in Kagi userbase, than OpenAI’s.