▲ | rowanG077 7 days ago | ||||||||||||||||
You are essentially saying any creator that has ever done sponsored content becomes a creator non-grata. I somewhat disagree with that. Sponsored content is a perverse incentive but it's also important to understand that creators can pick and choose for what they make sponsored content. So if you have an ethical creator can create sponsored content of a product they agree is actually that good. Well now the question is "How can you tell". And I don't think you generally can. Some people are really good at lying. In the end it's really about do you trust this creator or not. Which is what's it's about regardless if they took a sponsorship or not. | |||||||||||||||||
▲ | alpaca128 7 days ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
> Well now the question is "How can you tell". And I don't think you generally can. You can, actually, with a simple rule of thumb: if it's being advertised on YouTube, it's statistically low quality or a scam. The sheer number of brands that sponsor videos just to be exposed later for doing something shady is just too high. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
▲ | edwardbernays 7 days ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Sponsored content is fine. Sponsored content with improper public disclosure, or with irresponsible claims that do not reflect reality, is not fine. Super simple standard: if they lie or substantively misrepresent for a sponsor, they can no longer be trusted. |