> A dismissive “no” is not a helpful addition to this discussion.

Yes, your "no" must be more upbeat! Even if it's correct. You must be willing to temper the truth of it with something that doesn't hurt the feelings of the massive.

> Does it mean that we’ve reached AGI? No. Does it mean the process reflects exactly what humans do? No.

But here it's fine to use a "No." because these are your straw men, right?

Is it just wrong to use a "No." when it's not in safety padding for the overinvested?