>and those are two things you give up[0] shooting JPEG

No you don't? Good in camera JPEGs will utilise push-pull processing, exposing for maximal dynamic range all for you. You don't lose the advantages of the better optics and sensor just because the JPEG is produced in camera.

▲

Ancapistani 6 days ago | parent | next [-]

How would the camera know if you're exposing two stops below your intended EV because you plan to push it in post or if that _is_ your intended EV?

Furthermore, JPEG supports ~8 stops of dynamic range while my X-Pro3's raw files support ~14 stops. You lose almost half your total DR when you shoot JPEG (with that camera).

	▲	ubercow13 6 days ago \| parent [-]
		Because some will choose the exposure and decide when to underexpose and push for you, eg fuji DR feature. You choose your intended EV for the image and it chooses whether to underexpose and push based on the dynamic range of the scene. >You lose almost half your total DR when you shoot JPEG No because the camera is applying a tone curve that compresses that DR when producing the JPEG. You lose precision, not DR, but if you don't intend to process the image further it doesn't matter much.

▲

justincormack 6 days ago | parent | prev [-]

That should be configurable - my camera has 3 dynamic range settings, and I almost always use the narrowest one.