▲ | yodon 4 days ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pro tip: If you're writing an article on the significance of something called I/Q, it's cool to somewhere in the first couple pages say something about what I/Q is. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | gsf_emergency_2 4 days ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Q=Quadrature, I=In-phase (As you point out not in the first couple pages, but waaay down) he "explains" those https://wirelesspi.com/two-birds-with-one-tone-i-q-signals-a... Not trying to be charitable like furgot ... The wikipedia page is the first time I've seen authors go pro on the topic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | wucke13 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
https://www.pe0sat.vgnet.nl/sdr/iq-data-explained/ This is an excellent introduction to the concept and also to the why complex numbers are used to represent signal samples. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | dsp_man 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Thank you for the suggestion. That's the point. I/Q introduced early gets too complicated. This foundation needs to be built up. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | ykonstant 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Only people with a low I/Q would misunderstand this notation! | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | furgot 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Most technical writing is going to assume some familiarity with the discipline. If a reader encounters unfamiliar vocabulary in a technical article, they'd be well advised to look it up. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In-phase_and_quadrature_compon... |