▲ | chongli 6 days ago | |||||||
The problem with computational photography is that it uses software to make photos "look good" for everyday users. That may be an advantage for those users but it is basically a non-starter for a photographer because it makes it a crapshoot to take photos which predictably and faithfully render the scene. | ||||||||
▲ | askbjoernhansen 6 days ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
Lots of apps gives you other options for how to process the image data. I've had a bunch of "high-end" digital SLRs and they (and the software processing the raw files) do plenty computational processing as well. I completely agree that all else being equal it's possible to get photos with better technical quality from a big sensor, big lens, big raw file; but this article is more an example of "if you take sloppy photos with your phone camera you get sloppy photos". | ||||||||
▲ | dkga 6 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
This made me ask, is there a (perhaps Swift) API to get the raw pixels coming in from the camera, if there is such a thing? I mean, before any processing, etc. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
▲ | ChrisGreenHeur 6 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
Your brain also uses software to make what you see look good |