For individuals:

We have a Pro license implemented in our app. Some non-essential features like custom templates or multi-turn chat are gated behind a paid license. (A custom STT model will also be included soon.) There's still no sign-up required. We use keygen.sh to generate offline-verifiable license keys. Currently, it's priced at $179/year.

For business:

If they want to self-host some kind of admin server with integrations, access control, and SSO, we plan to sell a business license.

▲

teiferer 8 days ago | parent | next [-]

Does that mean the admin server is not open source?

	▲	yujonglee 8 days ago \| parent [-]
		no. it is open source. https://github.com/fastrepl/hyprnote/tree/main/apps/admin

▲

thedevilslawyer 8 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Another sso.tax candidate.

Let's actively not support software that chooses anti-security.

▲

johntopia 8 days ago | parent [-]

totally fair concern. we’re actually on the same side when it comes to promoting good security practices like SSO.

the reason we’re gating the admin server under a business license is less about profiting off sso and more about drawing a line between individual and organizational use. it includes a bunch of enterprise-specific features (sso, access control, integrations, ...) that typically require more support and maintenance.

that said, the core app is fully open-source and always will be - so individuals and teams who don’t need the admin layer can still use it freely and privately, without compromising security.

we’ll keep listening and evolving the model - after all, we're still very early and flexible. appreciate the pushback.

(edit: added some more words to reinforce our flexibility)

▲

ctxc 8 days ago | parent [-]

Fair stance. I believe sso tax is a necessary evil.

	▲	thedevilslawyer 8 days ago \| parent [-]
		Nothing fair about making software insecure. Don't normalise it.