Seen here:

https://mathstodon.xyz/@neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.uk/1149374...

Usage continues two years later ...

What are the actual security concerns when using OMEMO mentioned in the post? Most criticism I find is on implementations.

▲

5 days ago | parent | next [-]

[deleted]

▲

DoctorOW 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Saw this linked elsewhere: https://soatok.blog/2024/08/04/against-xmppomemo/

▲

xmpp-enjoyer 4 days ago | parent [-]

For balance, see OMEMO Author Tim Henkes' response [1] to the blog, which was moderated.

This is linked from this blog post [2] where the author explains that they prefer XMPP, because it is not a silo.

[1] https://www.moparisthebest.com/tim-henkes-omemo-response.txt

[2] https://www.moparisthebest.com/against-silos-signal/

	▲	devrandoom 4 days ago \| parent [-]
		That was a good read. The furry blog post read like a smear campaign. Extraordinary unprofessional.

▲

digianarchist 5 days ago | parent | prev [-]

https://omemo.top/

Wish there were more library implementations that clients could leverage.

▲

rpdillon 4 days ago | parent | prev [-]

That post, describing why we shouldn't be using a OMEMO, is almost incoherent. It doesn't outline any problem with the implementation at all. Every criticism is a metacriticism of some sort. Very strange.