I honestly can't see much of a difference that couldn't be explained by the photos not being taken simultaneously. I definitely can't tell enough of a difference that I wouldn't put the photo in a frame on the wall (which people almost certainly do, despite the author's assertion that "you never see a smartphone photo printed and framed")

Edit: Is this just a good bit of sarcasm/shitpost? If so, it's just a tad too subtle.

▲

TuringNYC 7 days ago | parent | next [-]

For what it is worth, all my printed and framed photos were on the iPhone, despite having a great SLR camera.

The best camera is the one you actually have on-hand at the moment you need to take the photo and that often ends up the phone camera.

	▲	matwood 7 days ago \| parent [-]
		Bingo. You also need to know your camera. I have a d7100, a Z5, and the latest iPhone pro. For quick snapshots it's really hard to beat the iPhone. If I can get very close to something, the iPhone can also do some cool things. My d7100 might be one of my favorite cameras of all time. I've taken very nice picks of birds mid-flight that would be very hard to do on a phone (impossible?). But, it's not a camera you pull out your pocket and start shooting snapshots. It takes time to learn and post-process. They are all just tools, pick the right one for what you're doing. And sometimes the right one is the one you have with you :)

▲

wat10000 7 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I have smartphone photos on my walls. They look damned good.

Is this person going around asking all of their friends what kind of camera they used to take the photos they have on display? Or are they just sure they can tell from looking?

	▲	aikinai 7 days ago \| parent [-]
		You absolutely can tell from looking, and you don't even need to be trying. Whenever I show people photos from trips or of my kids or whatnot, they immediately notice the quality ask "You took this on your phone!?" (since I'm showing the photo from my phone library and that would be the default assumption). Sure, people are used to phone photos and they're fine, but even laymen who aren't thinking about judging photo quality immediately notice and appreciate the quality of a real camera photo.

▲

Mashimo 6 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The color of their faces and shadow is what is noticeable for me.

▲

dankwizard 7 days ago | parent | prev [-]

It's subtle shitpost. He's playing the angle of camera bros that just can't accept any Tom, Dick, or Harry with an iphone could take a 95% comparable photo but don't call themselves photographers.