That isn't random though, the news conglomerate hates Google for eating their lunch so whenever Google does something they always write articles to try to generate outrage.

▲

xboxnolifes 5 days ago | parent | next [-]

The attempts aren't random, but the successes aren't guaranteed either. Just because someone tries to make a scene, doesn't mean it happens.

There are attempts to manufacture outrage constantly happening. Every day. But very few actually gain traction, let along make it to the mainstream.

▲

bryan_w 5 days ago | parent | prev [-]

You're right, but people ain't ready to hear that story yet.

▲

Eisenstein 5 days ago | parent [-]

People are not as naive as you think. They know everyone is looking out for their own interests, and that money rules everything.

The problem isn't that people aren't ready to hear the shocking revelations about the news being biased, it is that individuals don't want to be the odd one out. One person outraging over the total legitimate concern of being recorded in public with cameras on glasses gets laughed at. But if you get enough people at once to get upset then it becomes a movement.

If you think that people don't care about all these things that make life actively worse for the aggregate but are useful for individuals, then you are mistaken. They are just willing to go along with it if it appears everyone else is.

	▲	lazide 4 days ago \| parent [-]
		Also, there are only so many “fucks” anyone can give. People would rather conserve them towards things like not blowing up their personal relationships, or keeping their job, rather than some random social activist cause - unless that social activist cause is personal, or becomes worthwhile for other reasons.