The reality is the opposite of this post. LLMs are great at rapidly creating rough drafts, and humans are best (when properly trained) at critiquing LLM results.

So, LLMs are in fact better at blue-teaming, and humans are better at red-teaming.

▲

abalaji 5 days ago | parent | next [-]

I think this flips at the frontier which may be what Tao is commenting on.

▲

cubefox 4 days ago | parent [-]

Tao is a) unusually intelligent and b) an expert in his field. Most people are neither very intelligent nor have expert knowledge in any academic subject. So Tao is pretty much the least representative LLM user possible.

▲

auggierose 4 days ago | parent [-]

You could argue that Tao is the most representative LLM user possible, because why would you need not very intelligent people use LLMs? Just replace them with LLMs.

	▲	cubefox 4 days ago \| parent [-]
		I assume you wouldn't want to be replaced by an LLM.

▲

ozgrakkurt 4 days ago | parent | prev [-]

They are better at everything tbh