Emphasis on “and”.

> it affects pretty much everyone who got some value out of the tool AND is not a casual coder.

I didn’t mean casual in the negative sense, so there is no “better”, there is only casual and not casual.

My theory is that 5% sounds like a small number until you realize that many people just tried it and and didn’t like it, forgot to cancel, have it paid by their employer wishing for 100x improvements, or most people have found AI useful only in certain scenarios that they face every once in a while etc.