> Definitely, but isn't that progress?

That is beside the point of the original comment

> We solve problems and new problems appear, which we also solve.

In AI space these are not new problems. These are the same "let's try this new magic incantation agains a non-deterministic black box".

▲

danielbln 3 days ago | parent [-]

Ok man, you do you. I'm over here making food use of this tooling, but it's not for everyone. Agree to disagree.

▲

troupo 3 days ago | parent [-]

> I'm over here making food use of this tooling, but it's not for everyone.

Yup, you're the one using perfect tooling that never produces any issues, or erroneous output, and is perfect in every way.

Unlike these idiot opponents of yours who don't have the intelligence and skill to use these amazing magical tools.

Or, perhaps, your opponents actually use these tools daily and actually understand what they can and can't do?

▲

danielbln 3 days ago | parent [-]

Who says these tools don't make any mistakes? Don't put words in my mouth or project your own fallacies. Nothing in the world is perfect, but there is absolutely useful stuff to be had.

Keep your head in the sand though.

	▲	troupo 3 days ago \| parent [-]
		> Who says these tools don't make any mistakes? You heavily imply it in every comment you write. You've literally started debating my comment where I say that everyone runs into AI bullshit. You literally keep debating me when I point out that despite all the progress AI bullshit remains. Your literal answer to "It's not different from most people. Everyone runs into AI bullshit." was literally "Or, you know, there are different ways of using these tools." > Nothing in the world is perfect, but there is absolutely useful stuff to be had. Says the person claiming I put words in his mouth or projecting my fallacies. Where exactly did I say this stuff wasn't useful? Literally nowehere. > Keep your head in the sand though Someone recently told me: "Don't put words in my mouth or project your own fallacies. " Adieu.